2025, issue 1, p. 54-63
Received 22.02.2025; Revised 13.03.2025; Accepted 25.03.2025
Published 28.03.2025; First Online 30.03.2025
https://doi.org/10.34229/2707-451X.25.1.5
Previous | FULL TEXT (in Ukrainian) | Next
The Mykhaleviches’ Ideas Implemented for Rebuilding of Ukraine and Contributing to Sustainable Development in the Global Scope
Volodymir Ryaboshlyk *
, Olena Volovyk *
, Oleksii Lykhovyd
V.M. Glushkov Institute of Cybernetics of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv
* Correspondence: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Introduction. The achievements of the School of Modern Inter-Industrial Balance of the V.M. Glushkov Institute of Cybernetics of the NAS of Ukraine, founded by Vladimir.S. and Michael V. Mikhalevyches, are of interest both at the national and international levels. These developments can be interpreted as improvements in the methodology of two main approaches to innovative development, namely: "top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches .The top-down approach provides an econometric forecast of the characteristics of new technologies based on correlations between the volume of expenditures for new developments and the number of human and other resources employed in this, on the one hand, and the improvement of traditional and innovative, in particular "green", parameters, on the other hand. The bottom-up approach is more accurate and developed, and is based on the final results of specific developments of innovative technologies, for which the dynamic task of planning and forecasting their practical implementation is solved, as a balanced transitional process of replacing old technologies with new ones.
The article proposes a problem statement oriented to the supply, which has an independent economic interest and is solved by an optimization model that covers the volume of consumption, the dynamics of replacing old technologies with new ones, etc.
The purpose of the work is to develop an optimization model for finding the highest technologically permissible consumption to ensure a balanced transition process to new technologies, which provides for the highest possible welfare and calculate the optimal scenario, which may contain endogenous fluctuations caused by technological changes.
Results. An optimization model was built that reflects the dynamics of technologically permissible consumption during the transition period. The properties of the model were studied and the cyclical nature of the transition process was revealed; an optimal transition scenario was built. The example shows how even in the absence of problems on the demand side, inevitable recessions can still occur as the initial phase of the transition process.
Conclusions. The dynamics of the economy, driven by radical technological change, is a full business cycle with phases of initial temporary recession, recovery, growth, overheating and Kondratieff waves that decay to a stationary state or stagnation. The proposed modeling approach has the potential to increase the accuracy of planning and forecasting innovative and “green” development of all countries. For Ukraine – to increase the accuracy and detail of recovery planning, including “better than before” and “green recovery”.
Keywords: dynamic input-output models, optimization, innovation, test calculations.
Cite as: Ryaboshlyk V., Volovyk O., Lykhovyd O. The Mykhaleviches’ Ideas Implemented for Rebuilding of Ukraine and Contributing to Sustainable Development in the Global Scope. Cybernetics and Computer Technologies. 2025. 1. P. 54–63. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.34229/2707-451X.25.1.5
References
1. Mikhalevich V.S., Sergienko I.V., Shor N.Z. Investigation of optimization methods and their applications. Cybern Syst Anal. 1981. 17. P. 522–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01082482
2. Mikhalevich V.S., Ermol'ev Yu.M., Loskutov V.T. et al. Description of a software package for non-differentiable and stochastic optimization. Issledovaniye operatsiy i ASU. Kiev: Vyshcha shk., 1986. No. 27. P. 1–19. (in Russian)
3. Mikhalevich V.S., Bakaev A.A., Grytsenko V.I., Revenko V.L., Kuznetsov Yu.N. Information technology in transport / ed. V.S. Mikhalevich. Kiev: Nauk. Dumka, 1991. 204 p. (in Russian)
4. Mikhalevich V.S., Mikhalevich M.V., Podolev I.V. Modeling of some processes in the economy of Ukraine. 1993. 19 p. (Preprint / NANU. Inst. Kibernet. Im. V.M. Glushkova; 93-46). (in Russian)
5. Mikhalevich V.S., Mikhalevich M.V. Dynamic pricing macromodels for a transition economy. Cybern Syst Anal. 1995. 31. P. 409–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02366519
6. Mikhalevich V.S., Sergienko I.V. Modeling of transition economy. Models, methods, information technologies. Kiev: Nauk. dumka, 2005. 672 p. (in Russian)
7. Sergienko I.V., Mikhalevich M.V., Stetsyuk P.I., Koshlai L.B. Interindustry model of planned technological-structural changes. Cybern Syst Anal. 1998. 34. P. 319–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02666973
8. Stetsyuk P.I., Berezovskyi O.A., Lykhovyd O.P. Mathematical models, methods and software for planning interindustry structural and technological changes. In the book Methods of non-smooth optimization in applied problems. Kyiv: LAZURYT POLIGRAF, 2023. P. 165–205. (in Ukrainian)
9. Ryaboshlyk V. Modeling technological leaps. Proceedings of the Conference “Mathematical modeling, optimization and information technologies". 2016. Moldova, Chisinau. (in Russian)
10. Ryaboshlyk V. A dynamic input-output model with explicit new and old technologies: an application to the UK. Economic Systems Research. 2006. 18(2). P. 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09535310600653040
11. Ryaboshlyk V. An input-output proof of technological changes in business cycle (innovative estimation of innovation impacts). Economic Systems Research. 2025. (accepted for publication)
12. Kulyk V.V. Modeling the Inter-Industry Economy as a Critical Infrastructure: Generating Scenarios for the Development of the Economy of Ukraine under the Conditions of War and the Post-War Recovery. Cybern Syst Anal. 2023. 59. P. 967–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10559-023-00633-8
13. Lewney R., Pollitt H., Mercure J-F. From Input-Output to Macro-Econometric Model. 27th IIOA Conference in Glasgow, Scotland. 2019. P. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789813278226_0003
14. E3ME Model Manual v9.0 (Energy-Environment-Economy Macro-Econometric Model). Cambridge, the UK: Cambridge Econometrics. 2022.
15. MDM-E3: UK Multisectoral Dynamic Model – E3. Cambridge, the UK: Cambridge Econometrics. 2024.
16. Černý M., Bruckner M., Weinzettel J., Wiebe K., Kimmich C., Kerschner C., Hubacek K. Employment effects of the renewable energy transition in the electricity sector. An input-output approach. ETUI. European Trade Union Institute. Working Paper. 2021. https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/Employment%20effects%20of%20the%20 renewable%20energy%20transition%20in%20the%20electricity%20sector-An%20input-output%20approach-2021.pdf.
17. Černý M., Bruckner M., Weinzettel J., Wiebe K., Kimmich C., Kerschner C., Hubacek K. Global employment and skill level requirements for ‘Post-Carbon Europe’. Ecological Economics, 216, Article 108014. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.108014
18. Harris S., Weinzettel J., Bigano A., Källmén A. Low carbon cities in 2050? GHG emissions of European cities using production-based and consumption-based emission accounting methods, Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119206
19. Court C.D., Jackson R.W., Steele A.J.H., Adder J., Pickenpaugh G., Zelek C. Extending the Macroeconomic Impacts Forecasting Capabilities of the National Energy Modeling System. Regional Research Institute Publications and Working Papers. 2020. 217. P. 1–21.
20. Stiglitz J.E. Where modern macroeconomics went wrong. In Rebuilding Macroeconomic Theory, Vines D., Wills S. eds. Oxford Rev Econ Policy. 2018. Vol. 34, No. 1–2. P. 70–106.
21. Gropp W., Moré J.J. Optimization Environments and the NEOS Server. Approximation Theory and Optimization, M. D. Buhmann and A. Iserles, eds. Cambridge University Press, 1997. P. 167–182.
22. Czyzyk J., Mesnier M.P., Moré J.J. The NEOS Server. IEEE Journal on Computational Science and Engineering. 1998. 5(3). P. 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1109/99.714603
23. Dolan E. The NEOS Server 4.0 Administrative Guide. Technical Memorandum ANL/MCS-TM-250, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory. 2001. https://www.mcs.anl.gov/papers/TM-250.pdf
ISSN 2707-451X (Online)
ISSN 2707-4501 (Print)
Previous | FULL TEXT (in Ukrainian) | Next