2023, issue 3, p. 81-87

Received 13.09.2023; Revised 23.09.2023; Accepted 26.09.2023

Published 29.09.2023; First Online 19.10.2023

https://doi.org/10.34229/2707-451X.23.3.7

Previous  |  FULL TEXT (in Ukrainian)  |  Next

 

UDC 519.67

Using of Artificial Intelligence Methods in Judicial Proceedings

Maksym Milev,   Violeta Tretynyk * ORCID ID favicon Big

The National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

* Correspondence: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

Introduction. The judicial system in today's world is faced with a large number of cases that require efficient and fair resolution. Thanks to the development of information technologies, the automation of the process of conducting court cases and the introduction of intelligent systems have become urgent tasks for improving judicial justice.

The justice sector has been slower than other sectors to adopt artificial intelligence and information technology (IT) in general. However, in most countries the amount of digital information resulting from the use of IT in legal proceedings is increasing. In this regard, the possibility of using artificial intelligence (AI) in the work of judicial bodies, prosecutor's offices and other specialized judicial bodies around the world is increasingly being investigated.

Jurisprudence includes a wide range of problems and, accordingly, different sources of data for their solution. Using legislation, materials of criminal and administrative cases, concluded contracts and other legal documents, relevant specialists make decisions. In turn, artificial intelligence technologies, according to examples in other domains, can become assistants for specialists or make decisions in an autonomous mode..

The purpose of the article. To review the existing approaches to the application of artificial intelligence in the judicial system, to find out the shortcomings, advantages and limitations of machine learning algorithms in the judicial system. Determine the goals and methodology for further research.

Results. In this work, the application of machine learning methods for solving problems arising in the field of jurisprudence is considered, algorithms, data sets and goals for further work are defined.

 

Keywords: recurrent neural networks, machine learning, vectorization, text classification.

 

Cite as: Milev M., Tretynyk V. Using of Artificial Intelligence Methods in Judicial Proceedings. Cybernetics and Computer Technologies. 2023. 3. P. 81–87. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.34229/2707-451X.23.3.7

 

References

           1.     Nowotko P.M. AI in judicial application of law and the right to a court. Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Szczecin. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.235

           2.     Yassine S. Using Artificial Intelligence Tools in the Judicial Domain and the Evaluation of their Impact on the Prediction of Judgments Machine learning with neural networks. The 4th International Workshop on Statistical Methods and Artificial Intelligence (IWSMAI) March 15–17, 2023. Leuven, Belgium.

           3.     Jing R. A self-attention based LSTM network for text classification. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2019. Vol. 1207. P. 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1207/1/012008

           4.     Ahmad S. A hybrid CNN + BILSTM deep learning-based DSS for efficient prediction of judicial case decisions. Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology in Rabigh (FCITR). 4 May 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118318

           5.     Mikolov T. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2003. 3. P. 1137–1155.

 

 

ISSN 2707-451X (Online)

ISSN 2707-4501 (Print)

Previous  |  FULL TEXT (in Ukrainian)  |  Next

 

 

            Archive

 

© Website and Design. 2019-2024,

V.M. Glushkov Institute of Cybernetics of the NAS of Ukraine,

National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.