2024, issue 3, p. 96-104
Received 22.07.2024; Revised 19.08.2024; Accepted 10.09.2024
Published 24.09.2024; First Online 30.09.2024
https://doi.org/10.34229/2707-451X.24.3.10
Previous | FULL TEXT (in Ukrainian) | Next
UDC [004.8+528.8+502/504+614.841.2](477)
Forest Fire Hazard Forecasting Based on Google Earth Engine Open Satellite Data
Ivan Denkov * , Yevhen Nazarenko
V.M. Glushkov Institute of Cybernetics of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv
* Correspondence: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Introduction. Forest fires cause significant damage to both the natural fund and the national economy. In recent years, their harmful influence has increased due to global warming, and in Ukraine also due to the armed conflict. Thus, traditional methods of patrolling (ground and air) are not only costly, but also dangerous due to mines and possible shelling of border areas. Therefore, the role of surveillance using satellite systems is increasing. Space monitoring is more efficient and covers a larger area of the Earth's surface. Another important advantage is open access to information.
The purpose of the paper is to build a mathematical model for determining fire danger based on climatic and biophysical satellite data for the forests of Ukraine, as well as a similar climatic zone with the possibility of further scaling to other climatic regions and types of vegetation cover. To adhere to the principles of open science, Google Earth Engine (GEE), a cloud-based platform that provides open access to dynamic collections of pre-processed Earth remote sensing results, was chosen.
Results. Climatic and biophysical data for the forests of Ukraine for the years 2017-2020 were collected using the tools of the Python library for working with GEE data. Further, the obtained data were processed by two methods: linear (PCA) and non-linear (UMAP) in order to obtain statistically independent attributes. Both obtained datasets were subjected to statistical processing using the Bayesian method. Finally, for each point on the map for which information was collected, an indicator was calculated that predicted fire danger if the obtained value was greater than 1 and its absence in the opposite case.
The resulting model showed its efficiency on training data. On the test dataset (data on Polish forests for the same period), the results turned out to be worse, in particular, the model using PCA did not predict absence of fire danger, and the model using UMAP generally showed lower performance. This can be due to both the imperfection of the model and the small size of the test dataset or factors unrelated to natural processes (in particular the human factor).
Conclusions. An approach to forest fires forecasting based on satellite data is proposed. The obtained results indicate that the model is already effective at this stage, although machine learning methods have not yet been applied. However, it needs further improvement, so work on the model will be continued. Along with improving the quality of forecasts, attention will be paid to the geographic expansion and the creation of a web application.
Keywords: fire danger in forests, satellite data, correlation, PCA, UMAP, hard-to-reach areas.
Cite as: Denkov I., Nazarenko Y. Forest Fire Hazard Forecasting Based on Google Earth Engine Open Satellite Data. Cybernetics and Computer Technologies. 2024. 3. P. 96–104. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.34229/2707-451X.24.3.10
References
1. Vyklyuk Y., Radovanović M.M., Stanojević G., etc. Connection of Solar Activities and Forest Fires in 2018: Events in the USA (California), Portugal and Greece. Sustainability. 2020. 12 (24). 10261. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410261
2. Santopaolo A., Saif S.S., Pietrabissa A., Giuseppi A. Forest Fire Risk Prediction from Satellite Data with Convolutional Neural Networks. 29th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation (MED). 22–25 June 2021. https://doi.org/10.1109/MED51440.2021.9480226
3. Mohammed Z., Hanae S., Setti L. Comparative study on machine learning algorithms for early fire forest detection system using geodata. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE). 2020. 10 (5). P. 5507–5513. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp5507-5513
4. Zhang G., Wang M., Liu K. Deep neural networks for global wildfire susceptibility modeling. Ecological Indicators. 2021. 127. 107735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107735
5. Zhang G., Wang M., Yang B., Liu K. Current and Future Patterns of Global Wildfire Based on Deep Neural Networks. Earth’s Future. 2024. 12 (2). e2023EF004088. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004088
6. Tulchinsky V., Lavreniuk S., Kolomiyets O. Development of Interoperable Geoportal Infrastructure for Bidirectional Data Exchange. Stage 3. Develop a Prototype of a Subsystem of Cloud Geoinformation Computations for Geoportal. 2023. V.M. Glushkov Institute of Cybernetics of the NAS of Ukraine. Technical report. 67 p. (in Ukrainian) https://nrat.ukrintei.ua/searchdoc/0223U005825/ (accessed: 02.07.2024).
ISSN 2707-451X (Online)
ISSN 2707-4501 (Print)
Previous | FULL TEXT (in Ukrainian) | Next